In his inaugural address over 200 years ago, Thomas Jefferson, probably not a believer, said this about government:
"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor and bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government."
As Barack Obama swore an oath today to "protect, preserve, and defend" the Constitution this morning in front of millions of people (odd in itself since he believes the document is "fatally flawed")*, so many Americans echo the cry of Jefferson in what constitutes "good government." Imagine a world where government allowed its citizens to live without interference--in business, in healthcare, in education. Two hundred years ago, those men who shaped our government desperately wanted a government institution that punished evildoers and protected its people--that's it! There are countless examples of presidents like James Madison and Thomas Jefferson vetoing bills that they deemed "unconstitutional" because they were outside of the federal government's jurisdiction. Look at just a few of the quotes from our founding fathers and former presidents:
"I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution, and I do not believe that the power and duty of the General Government ought to be extended to the relief of individual suffering which is in no manner properly related to the public service or benefit."
-- President Grover Cleveland vetoing a bill for charity relief (18 Congressional Record 1875 [1877]
"Those who would give up essential Liberty to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Ben Franklin, Respectfully Quoted, p. 201, Suzy Platt, Barnes & Noble, 1993
"I cannot find any authority in the Constitution for public charity. [To approve the measure] would be contrary to the letter and spirit of the Constitution and subversive to the whole theory upon which the Union of these States is founded."
-- President Franklin Pierce's 1854 veto of a measure to help the mentally ill.
How vilified would our President be if he refused to give government money towards healthcare? He would be seen as arrogant, selfish, and evil. The media would destroy him. And yet so many of our former presidents feared gratuitous interference by the federal government.
Nevertheless, Neal Boortz, however polarizing he is, made a good comment about today's historical events:
"The institution is larger than any man, and any man in that office deserves our respect: Perhaps not our support at all times, but always our respect."
It is good to be reminded of that, and despite my disapproval of virtually everything Barack Obama says, he is our President and he deserves my respect.
Reverend Joseph Lowery, however, does not. As a white person (which makes me evil, in case you did not know), I took serious offense at his closing remarks this morning during his benediction following Obama's speech:
"....help us work for that day when black will not be asked to give back, when brown can stick around, when yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man, and when white will embrace what is right."
His assumption is that over the course of history, white men and women have rejected what is right, what is moral, what is just. If we have still not "embraced what is right," then what exactly was happening when thousands of American men gave their lives to prevent the Nazi world from taking over? And what was happening when William Wilberforce abolished the slave trade in England in the 19th century? Or when Jim Elliot selflessly gave his life to evangelize to the Waodani people in Ecuador?
The list goes on, folks; he should have thought more carefully before he said what he said. But of course, the media refuses to address these issues--for now we must continue to idolize Barack Obama by shooting footage of weeping women waving their American flags with Obama’s picture plastered over the stars and stripes. We must continue to honor him, not because of the “content of his character, but because of the color of his skin.” Martin Luther King, Jr. would be ashamed.
*http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Civil-Rights-Examiner~y2008m11d3-Obamas-AntiCivil-Rights-Movement)